规范依据
NORMATIVE BASIS规范命题、原文与来源 · Rule and sources收起 · Collapse展开 · Expand
规范命题与识别入口
承认、默许、禁止反言及国家长期行为对权利主张的影响。
触发事实
- 2017 Q1 展示了本规范在“跨界含水层取水与单方声明”事实结构中的用法。
- 2017 Q3 展示了本规范在“文化财产返还”事实结构中的用法。
- 2020 Q1 展示了本规范在“国家继承与条约连续性”事实结构中的用法。
- 2024 Q3 展示了本规范在“领事探视、投资入籍与国籍承认”事实结构中的用法。
裁判与程序背景
Temple of Preah Vihear (1962)源于一项具体争端：法国殖民时期制作的地图把柏威夏寺标在柬埔寨一侧，泰国多年未正式提出异议。泰国后来占领寺庙区域，柬埔寨向国际法院请求确认主权。 法院不是先写出抽象规则再寻找事实，而是在当事方相反主张、可用证据和程序请求的限制内形成了以下命题：承认、默许、禁止反言及国家长期行为对权利主张的影响。
裁判规则原句
中文译文 · Chinese translation当时的情势要求暹罗当局倘若对该地图有异议或存有任何重大疑问，理应在合理期限内作出反应。然而暹罗当局无论当时还是其后多年均未作出反应，故应认定其已默认。
英文原文 · English[T]he circumstances were such as called for some reaction, within a reasonable period, on the part of the Siamese authorities, if they wished to disagree with the map or had any serious question to raise in regard to it. They did not do so, either then or for many years, and thereby must be held to have acquiesced.
中文译文 · Chinese translation即便暹罗于一九零八年是否接受该地图（从而是否接受图上所示边界）尚存疑问，法院认为，鉴于其后的事态发展，泰国现已因其自身行为而被禁止反言，不得主张其当时并未接受该地图。
英文原文 · EnglishEven if there were any doubt as to Siam's acceptance of the map in 1908, and hence of the frontier indicated thereon, the Court would consider, in the light of the subsequent course of events, that Thailand is now precluded by her conduct from asserting that she did not accept it.
标记后，四段进度条与首页复习清单会同步更新。